Reading List
Below, you will find a curated reading list of publications by Canadian researchers.
The articles are grouped into themes on the left side of the page.
If you are a Canadian researcher and would like your publications featured here, please use the form on the Connect page.
Genomics Nursing Policy Research
Genomics and Health Disparities
Overview of Nursing
& Genomics
Acorn, M., Chiu, P., Limoges, J., & Gretchev, A. (2024). Optimizing the new model of nurse practitioner regulation in Canada to support the integration of genomics. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 37(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2024.27468
Abstract
The demand for genomic services has outpaced the capacity of the health system, thus creating opportunities for nurse practitioners (NPs) to develop genomic literacy and expand the genomics-informed services that NPs can offer to optimize safe and equitable healthcare. The new model of NP regulation that aims to educate all NPs, based on a set of common entry-level competencies, has the potential to accelerate the integration of genomics into education and practice. In this commentary, we explore opportunities within a new NP regulatory framework and highlight how NPs can strengthen Canadians' access to genomic technologies as clinicians, advocates, leaders, scholars and educators.
Limoges, J., Puddester, R., Pike, A., Calzone, K, Carlsson, L., Letourneau, N. & Gretchev, A. (2024). Leadership strategies for genomics integration: A descriptive study using the GGNPS-CA. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 37(2), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2024.27467
Abstract
The demand for genomic services that improve disease prevention, early detection and safer treatments has already outpaced the capacity of the current system. Nursing leadership strategies are urgently needed to integrate genomic discoveries into education and practice. Using findings from the national Canadian Adaptation of the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey completed by 1,012 Canadian nurses, we recommend leadership strategies to build conducive practice environments and assist nurses in developing genomic literacy and confidence to fully participate in the integration of genomics into education and practice. Collaboration across the domains of nursing practice can generate sustainable strategies that assist nurses to be full participants in interdisciplinary teams.
Limoges, J. L., Halkoaho, A., Laaksonen, M., & Muskaan, K. (2024). Developing leadership competencies for genomics integration through globally networked learning and education. Frontiers in Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1404741.
Abstract
Aim: To describe the implementation and evaluation of an education strategy called the globally networked learning-genomics (GNL-G) used in Master’s courses in Canada and Finland. The study focused on the feasibility and effectiveness of GNL-G in developing leadership competencies for integrating genomics into practice.
Methods: Interpretive description qualitative methodology was used to explore how GNL-G, global exchanges and assignments standardized with the Assessment of Strategies to Integrate Genomics in Nursing (ASIGN) tool influenced competency development. The Reporting Item Standards for Education and its Evaluation in Genomics (RISE2 Genomics) framework guided the design, implementation, evaluation, and reporting of GNL-G. Data included one-to-one interviews, written assignments, and reflections.
Results: Interviews and assignment data from three cohorts of students for a total of ten Canadian and 11 Finnish master’s students participated in this study. The ASIGN Tool played a crucial role in facilitating students’ analysis of their practice context and the development of leadership strategies. Participation in GNL-G enhanced students’ confidence to lead efforts to integrate genomics, irrespective of their genomics expertise. Engagement with global peers emphasized the importance of incorporating equity, ethics, and social justice into leadership strategies for genomics integration.
Conclusion: The GNL-G strategy enhanced leadership competencies for genomics integration in graduate students from Canada and Finland. The ASIGN Tool and global peer collaboration highlight the importance of innovative educational methods in preparing leaders for the complexities of genomics in healthcare.
Chiu, P., Gretchev, A., Limoges, J., Puddester, R., Carlsson, L., Pike, A., Leslie, K., Dordunoo, D. (2024). Fostering pan-Canadian collaboration to advance new nursing practice: A case study from the genomics experience. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 37(2), 41.48. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2024.27470
Abstract
A skilled nursing workforce can ensure that Canadians have safe and equitable access to genomics-informed healthcare. Evidence-informed frameworks designed to support the implementation of genomics across nursing indicate that leadership and collaboration are critical to success. However, siloed provincial and territorial healthcare systems create challenges for harmonizing efforts. In this article, we discuss a solution to bring together nurse leaders across jurisdictions and domains of practice to co-create pan-Canadian strategic directions for genomics integration. We highlight the importance of national collaboration and the value it brings to nursing workforce development in rapidly changing social and technological contexts.
Chiu, P., Limoges, J., Pike, A., Calzone, K., Tonkin, E., Puddester, R., Gretchev, A., Dewell, S., Newton, L., & Leslie, K. (2024). Integrating genomics into Canadian oncology nursing policy: Insights from a comparative policy analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 80(11), 4488-4509. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16099
Abstract
Aim: To learn from two jurisdictions with mature genomics-informed nursing policy infrastructure-the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK)-to inform policy development for genomics-informed oncology nursing practice and education in Canada.
Design: Comparative document and policy analysis drawing on the 3i + E framework.
Methods: We drew on the principles of a rapid review and identified academic literature, grey literature and nursing policy documents through a systematic search of two databases, a website search of national genomics nursing and oncology nursing organizations in the US and UK, and recommendations from subject matter experts on an international advisory committee. A total of 94 documents informed our analysis.
Results: We found several types of policy documents guiding genomics-informed nursing practice and education in the US and UK. These included position statements, policy advocacy briefs, competencies, scope and standards of practice and education and curriculum frameworks. Examples of drivers that influenced policy development included nurses' values in aligning with evidence and meeting public expectations, strong nurse leaders, policy networks and shifting healthcare and policy landscapes.
Conclusion: Our analysis of nursing policy infrastructure in the US and UK provides a framework to guide policy recommendations to accelerate the integration of genomics into Canadian oncology nursing practice and education.
Implications for the profession: Findings can assist Canadian oncology nurses in developing nursing policy infrastructure that supports full participation in safe and equitable genomics-informed oncology nursing practice and education within an interprofessional context.
Impact: This study informs Canadian policy development for genomics-informed oncology nursing education and practice. The experiences of other countries demonstrate that change is incremental, and investment from strong advocates and collaborators can accelerate the integration of genomics into nursing. Though this research focuses on oncology nursing, it may also inform other nursing practice contexts influenced by genomics.
Chiu, P., Limoges, J., Puddester, R., Gretchev, A., Carlsson, L., Leslie, K., Flaming, D., Meyer, A., & Pike, A. (2024). Developing policy infrastructure to guide genomics-informed oncology nursing in Canada: An interpretive descriptive study. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 56(4), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621241252615
Abstract
Background: Genomic technologies such as genetic testing and precision treatments are rapidly becoming routine in oncology care, and nurses play an increasingly important role in supporting the growing demands for genomics-informed healthcare. Policy infrastructure such as competencies, standards, scope of practice statements, and education and curriculum frameworks are urgently needed to guide these practice and education changes.
Purpose: This study is part of a larger three-phase project to develop recommendations and catalyze action for genomics-informed oncology nursing education and practice for the Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology and the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing. This phase aimed to enhance understanding of policy needs and action drivers for genomics-informed oncology nursing education and practice through the perspectives of Canadian oncology nurses and patient partners.
Methods: Interpretive description methodology guided the study. Twenty semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted; 17 with oncology nurses in various domains of practice, and three with patient partner representatives. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently.
Results: Our analysis identified three themes: 1) nurses and patients recognize that it is time for action, 2) nurses and patients see advantages to executing intentional, strategic, and collaborative policy development, and 3) leadership and advocacy are required to drive action.
Conclusion: Nursing policy infrastructure is required to increase genomic literacy, support nurses in providing safe patient care, and establish clear roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities within the interdisciplinary team. Strong leadership and advocacy at the practice, organizational, and systems levels are vital to accelerating action.
Limoges, J., Chiu, P., Dordunoo, D., Puddester, R., Pike, A., Wonsiak, T., Zakher, B., Carlsson, L., & Mussell, J. K. (2024). Nursing strategies to address health disparities in genomics-informed care: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 22(11), 2267-2312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295914
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this review was to map the available global evidence on strategies that nurses can use to facilitate genomics-informed health care to address health disparities to inform the development of a research and action agenda.
Introduction: The integration of genomics into health care is improving patient outcomes through better prevention, diagnostics, and treatment; however, scholars have noted concerns with widening health disparities. Nurses work across the health system and can address health disparities from a clinical, research, education, policy, and leadership perspective. To do this, a comprehensive understanding of existing genomics-informed strategies is required.
Inclusion criteria: Published (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies; systematic and literature reviews; and text and opinion papers) and unpublished (gray) literature that focused on genomics-informed nursing strategies to address health disparities over the past 10 years were included. No limitations were placed on language.
Methods: The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search was undertaken on May 25, 2023, across 5 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Gray literature was searched through websites, including the International Society of Nurses in Genetics and the Global Genomics Nursing Alliance. Abstracts, titles, and full texts were screened by 2 or more independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool. The coded data were analyzed by 2 or more independent reviewers using conventional content analysis, and the summarized results are presented using descriptive statistics and evidence tables.
Results: In total, we screened 818 records and 31 were included in the review. The most common years of publication were 2019 (n=5, 16%), 2020 (n=5, 16%), and 2021 (n=5, 16%). Most papers came from the United States (n=25, 81%) followed by the Netherlands (n=3, 10%), United Kingdom (n=1, 3%), Tanzania (n=1, 3%), and written from a global perspective (n=1, 3%). Nearly half the papers discussed cancer-related conditions (n=14, 45%) and most of the others did not specify a disease or condition (n=12, 39%). In terms of population, nurse clinicians were mentioned the most frequently (n=16, 52%) followed by nurse researchers, scholars, or scientists (n=8, 26%). The patient population varied, with African American patients or communities (n=7, 23%) and racial or ethnic minorities (n=6, 19%) discussed most frequently. The majority of equity issues focused on inequitable access to genetic and genomics health services among ethnic and racial groups (n=14, 45%), individuals with lower educational attainment or health literacy (n=6, 19%), individuals with lower socioeconomic status (n=3, 10%), migrants (n=3, 10%), individuals with lack of insurance coverage (n=2, 6%), individuals living in rural or remote areas (n=1, 3%), and individuals of older age (n=1, 3%). Root causes contributing to health disparity issues varied at the patient, provider, and system levels. Strategies were grouped into 2 categories: those to prepare the nursing workforce and those nurses can implement in practice. We further categorized the strategies by domains of practice, including clinical practice, education, research, policy advocacy, and leadership. Papers that mentioned strategies focused on preparing the nursing workforce were largely related to the education domain (n=16, 52%), while papers that mentioned strategies that nurses can implement were mostly related to clinical practice (n=19, 61%).
Conclusions: Nurses in all domains of practice can draw on the identified strategies to address health disparities related to genomics in health care. We found a notable lack of intervention and evaluation studies exploring the impact on health and equity outcomes. Additional research informed by implementation science that measures health outcomes is needed to identify best practices.
Dewell, S., Benzies, K., & Ginn, C. (2020). Precision health and nursing: Seeing the familiar in the foreign. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(3), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562120945159
Abstract
Precision health is the integration of personal genomic data with biological, environmental, behavioral, and other information relevant to the care of a patient. Genetics and genomics are essential components of precision health. Genetics is the study of the effects of individual genes, and genomics is the study of all the components of the genome and interactions between genes, environmental factors, and other psychosocial and cultural factors. Knowledge about the role of genetics and genomics on health outcomes has increased substantially since the completion of the human genome project in 2003. Insights about genetics and genomics obtained from bench science are now having positive clinical implications on patient health outcomes. Nurses have the potential to make distinct contributions to precision health due to their unique role in the health care system. In this article, we discuss gaps in the development of precision health in nursing and how nursing can expand the definition of precision health to actualize its potential. Precision health plays a role in nursing practice. Understanding this connection positions nurses to incorporate genetic and genomic knowledge into their nursing practice.
Limoges, J., Pike, A., Dewell, S., Meyer, A., Puddester, R., & Carlsson, L. (2022). Leading Canadian nurses into the genomic era of healthcare. Canadian Journal of Nursing Leadership, 35(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2022.26869
Abstract
Genomics is having a profound impact on every aspect of healthcare. To support nurses to develop genomic literacy and integrate genomics into care, an engagement framework was created. The framework uses principles of nursing intraprofessional collaboration, the knowledge-to-action cycle and the diffusion of innovations theory. This framework was used to identify six key priorities for action and leadership strategies to accelerate and sustain the nurses' engagement with genomics. With leadership and genomic literacy, nurses can fully participate in the creation and implementation of new care pathways, deliver education, advance research linked to genomics and improve patient experience and health outcomes.
Puddester, R., Limoges, J., Dewell, S., Maddigan, J., Carlsson, L., & Pike, A. (2023). The Canadian landscape of genetics and genomics in nursing: A policy document analysis. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621231159164
Abstract
Background: Genetics and genomics (GG) are transforming approaches to healthcare in Canada and around the globe. Canadian nurses must be prepared to integrate GG in their practice, but modest research in this area suggests that Canadian nurses have limited GG competency. Countries that have integrated GG across nursing provided guidance to nurses about the practice implications of GG through regional nursing policy documents. These documents propelled action to integrate GG across nursing. Little is known about the GG content in the nursing policy document infrastructure in Canada.
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the guidance for GG-informed nursing practice as provided by Canadian nursing organizations in official professional documents.
Methods: Qualitative document analysis was used. A hybrid inductive/deductive analysis approach was used to analyze findings within the diffusion of innovation theory framework.
Results: There is an overall lack of depth and breadth of Canadian nursing documents that include content related to GG. Of the (n = 37) documents analyzed, four themes were generated including (a) GG guidance in nursing education; (b) regulators' requirements for foundational GG knowledge, (c) Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) as an early catalyst to GG integration; and (d) early adopters in speciality practice.
Conclusion: There are opportunities to enhance the guidance available to Canadian nurses for the application of GG, through documents of nursing professional associations, nursing education accreditation organizations, and regulatory bodies. Findings suggest oncology and perinatal nurses are the early adopters which is an important consideration in future strategies to implement GG into Canadian nursing.
Parenting/Early
Childhood
Potter-Dickey, A., Letourneau, N., Ntanda, H., Giesbrecht, G., Silveira, P. P., Dewell, S., & de Koning, A. P. J. (2021). Associations among parental caregiving quality, cannabinoid receptor 1 expression-based polygenic scores, and infant-parent attachment: Evidence for differential genetic susceptibility? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 704392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.704392.
Abstract
Attachment is a biological evolutionary system contributing to infant survival. When primary caregivers/parents are sensitive and responsive to their infants’ needs, infants develop a sense of security. Secure infant attachment has been linked to healthy brain and organ-system development. Belsky and colleagues proposed the term differential susceptibility to describe context-dependent associations between genetic variations and behavioral outcomes as a function of parenting environments. Variations in the Cannabinoid Receptor Gene 1 (CNR1) are associated with memory, mood, and reward and connote differential susceptibility to more and less optimal parental caregiving quality in predicting children’s behavioral problems.
Aim: To determine if parental caregiving quality interacts with children’s expression-based polygenic risk score (ePRS) for the CNR1 gene networks in the prefrontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus in predicting the probability of attachment security and disorganized attachment.
Design: Prospective correlational methods examined maternal-infant pairs (n = 142) from which infants provided DNA samples at 3 months. Parental caregiving quality was assessed via the Child Adult Relationship Experiment (CARE)-index at 6 months, and attachment security via the Strange Situation Procedure at a mean age of 22 months. The CNR1 ePRSs include genes co-expressed with the CNR1 genes in the prefrontal cortex, striatum, or hippocampus, and were calculated using the effect size of the association between the individual single nucleotide polymorphisms from those genes and region-specific gene expression (GTEx). Logistic regression was employed (alpha < 0.05, two-tailed) to examine the main and interaction effects between parental caregiving quality and ePRSs in predicting attachment patterns. Interpretation of results was aided by analyses that distinguished between differential susceptibility and diathesis-stress.
Results: Significant interactions were observed between (1) maternal sensitivity and ePRS in the striatum in predicting attachment security, (2) maternal unresponsiveness with the ePRS in the hippocampus in predicting disorganization, and (3) maternal controlling with the ePRS in the hippocampus in predicting disorganization.
Conclusion: These findings offer support for genetic differential susceptibility to the quality of maternal sensitivity in the context of the ePRS in the striatum. However, the significant interactions between hippocampal ePRS and maternal unresponsiveness and controlling in predicting the probability of disorganization were more suggestive of the diathesis-stress model.
Letourneau, N., Giesbrecht, G. F., Bernier, F. P., & Joschko, J. (2014). How do interactions between early caregiving environment and genes influence health and behavior? Biological Research for Nursing, 16(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800412463602
Abstract
To promote optimal health and behavioral outcomes in children, nurses have long supported parents in providing the best possible care and nurturance to their offspring. A growing body of neuroscience research argues convincingly for the combined influences of genes and early caregiving on producing an individual’s unique health and behavioral phenotype. In this article, we systematically review studies that demonstrate the relationship between qualities of early caregiving and genetic propensity to health and behavioral outcomes. From an initial set of 255 articles, 24 articles met our inclusion criteria. The outcomes fall into four distinct groups: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) response to stress, externalizing behavior, internalizing behavior, and disorganized attachment. In the articles, authors examined genes that code for the 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) transporter genes linked polymorphic region [5-HTTLPR] serotonin transporter promoter, D4 dopamine receptor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and monoamine oxidase A promoter. The reviewed studies suggest that the effect of the early rearing environment on gene expression relates mainly to HPA response to stress, whereas interactions between genes and caregiving mainly relate to behavior and attachment. Findings have implications for nurses focused on advocacy, prevention, and intervention to support the healthy development of children in families faced with adversity.
Letourneau, Ntanda, H., Jong, V. L., Mahinpey, N., Giesbrecht, G., & Ross, K. M. (2021). Prenatal maternal distress and immune cell epigenetic profiles at 3‐months of age. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(5), 973–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22103
Background
Prenatal maternal distress predicts altered offspring immune outcomes, potentially via altered epigenetics. The role of different kinds of prenatal maternal distress on DNA methylation profiles is not understood.
Methods
A sample of 117 women (AprON cohort) were followed from pregnancy to the postpartum period. Maternal distress (depressive symptoms, pregnancy-specific anxiety, stressful life events) were assessed mid-pregnancy, late-pregnancy, and 3-months postpartum. DNA methylation profiles were obtained from 3-month-old blood samples. Principal component analysis identified two epigenetic components, characterized as Immune Signaling and DNA Transcription through gene network analysis. Covariates were maternal demographics, pre-pregnancy body mass index, child sex, birth gestational age, and postpartum maternal distress. Penalized regression
(LASSO) models were used.
Results
Late-pregnancy stressful life events, b = 0.006, early-pregnancy depressive symptoms, b = 0.027, late-pregnancy depressive symptoms, b = 0.014, and pregnancy-specific anxiety during late pregnancy, b = −0.631, were predictive of the Immune Signaling component, suggesting that these aspects of maternal distress could affect
methylation in offspring immune signaling pathways. Only early-pregnancy depressive symptoms was predictive of the DNA Transcription component, b = −0.0004, suggesting that this aspect of maternal distress is implicated in methylation of offspring DNA transcription pathways.
Conclusions
Exposure, timing and kind of prenatal maternal distress could matter in the prediction of infant immune epigenetic profiles.
Merrill, Gladish, N., Fu, M. P., Moore, S. R., Konwar, C., Giesbrecht, G. F., MacIssac, J. L., Kobor, M. S., & Letourneau, N. L. (2021). Associations of peripheral blood DNA methylation and estimated monocyte proportion differences during infancy with toddler attachment style. Attachment & Human Development, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2021.1938872
Abstract
Attachment is a motivational system promoting felt security to a caregiver resulting in a persistent internal working model of interpersonal behavior. Attachment styles are developed in early social environments and predict future health and development outcomes with potential biological signatures, such as epigenetic modifications like DNA methylation (DNAm). Thus, we hypothesized infant DNAm would associate with toddler attachment styles. An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of blood DNAm from 3-month-old infants was regressed onto children’s attachment style from the Strange Situation Procedure at 22-months at multiple DNAm Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) sites. The 26 identified CpGs associated with proinflammatory immune phenotypes and cognitive development. In post-hoc analyses, only maternal cognitive-growth fostering, encouraging intellectual exploration, contributed. For disorganized children, DNAm-derived cell-type proportions estimated higher monocytes –cells in immune responses hypothesized to increase with early adversity. Collectively, these findings suggested the potential biological embedding of both adverse and advantageous social environments as early as 3-months-old.
Letourneau, N. L. (2021). Paternal adverse childhood experiences: Associations with infant DNA methylation. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(6), e22174. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22174
Abstract
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), or cumulative childhood stress exposures, such as abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction, predict later health problems in both the exposed individuals and their offspring. One potential explanation suggests exposure to early adversity predicts epigenetic modification, especially DNA methylation (DNAm), linked to later health. Stress experienced preconception by mothers may
associate with DNAm in the next generation. We hypothesized that fathers’ exposure to ACEs also associates with their offspring DNAm, which, to our knowledge, has not been previously explored. An epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of blood DNAm (n = 45) from 3-month-old infants was regressed onto fathers’ retrospective ACEs at multiple Cytosine-phosphate-Guanosine (CpG) sites to discover associations. This accounted for infants’ sex, age, ethnicity, cell type proportion, and genetic variability. Higher ACE scores associated with methylation values at eight CpGs. Posthoc analysis found no contribution of paternal education, income, marital status, and parental postpartum depression, but did with paternal smoking and BMI along with infant sleep latency. These same CpGs also contributed to the association between paternal ACEs and offspring attention problems at 3 years. Collectively, these findings suggested there were biological associations with paternal early life adversity and offspring DNAm in infancy, potentially affecting offspring later childhood outcomes.
Letourneau, Ntanda, H., Jong, V. L., Mahinpey, N., Giesbrecht, G., & Ross, K. M. (2021). Prenatal maternal distress and immune cell epigenetic profiles at 3‐months of age. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(5), 973–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22103
Background
Prenatal maternal distress predicts altered offspring immune outcomes, potentially via altered epigenetics. The role of different kinds of prenatal maternal distress on DNA methylation profiles is not understood.
Methods
A sample of 117 women (APrON cohort) were followed from pregnancy to the postpartum period. Maternal distress (depressive symptoms, pregnancy-specific anxiety, stressful life events) were assessed mid-pregnancy, late-pregnancy, and 3-months postpartum. DNA methylation profiles were obtained from 3-month-old blood samples. Principal component analysis identified two epigenetic components, characterized as Immune Signaling and DNA Transcription through gene network analysis. Covariates were maternal demographics, pre-pregnancy body mass index, child sex, birth gestational age, and postpartum maternal distress. Penalized regression
(LASSO) models were used.
Results
late-pregnancy stressful life events, b = 0.006, early-pregnancy depressive symptoms, b = 0.027, late-pregnancy depressive symptoms, b = 0.014, and pregnancy-specific anxiety during late pregnancy, b = −0.631, were predictive of the Immune Signaling component, suggesting that these aspects of maternal distress could affect
methylation in offspring immune signaling pathways. Only early-pregnancy depressive symptoms was predictive of the DNA Transcription component, b = −0.0004, suggesting that this aspect of maternal distress is implicated in methylation of offspring DNA transcription pathways.
Conclusions
Exposure timing and kind of prenatal maternal distress could matter in the prediction of infant immune epigenetic profiles.
Mighton, C., Carlsson, L., Clausen, M., Casalino, S., Shickh, S.,…Bombard, Y. (2019) Development of patient profiles to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results. European Journal of Human Genetics, 27, 1008-1017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0352-2
Abstract
Guidelines recommend that providers engage patients in shared decision-making about receiving incidental results (IR) prior to genomic sequencing (GS), but this can be time-consuming, given the myriad of IR and variation in patients’ preferences. We aimed to develop patient profiles to inform pre-test counseling for IR. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants as a part of a randomized trial of the GenomicsADvISER.com, a decision aid for selecting IR. Interviews explored factors participants considered when deliberating over learning IR. Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis and constant comparison. Participants were mostly female (28/31) and about half of them were over the age of 50 (16/31). We identified five patient profiles that reflect common contextual factors, attitudes, concerns, and perceived utility of IR. Information Enthusiasts self-identified as “planners” and valued learning most or all IR to enable planning and disease prevention because “knowledge is power”. Concerned Individuals defined themselves as “anxious,” and were reluctant to learn IR, anticipating negative psychological impacts from IR. Contemplators were discerning about the value and limitations of IR, weighing health benefits with the impacts of not being able to “un-know” information. Individuals of Advanced Life Stage did not consider IR relevant for themselves and primarily considered their implications for family members. Reassurance Seekers were reassured by previous negative genetic test results which shaped their expectations for receiving no IR: “hopefully [GS will] be negative, too. And then I can rest easy”. These profiles could inform targeted counseling for IR by providing a framework to address common values, concerns. and misconceptions.
Mighton, C., Carlsson, L., Clausen, M., Casalino, S., Shickh, S., McCuaig, L., Joshi, E., Panchal, S., Semotiuk, K., Ott, K., Elser, C., Eisen, A., Kim, R. H., Lerner-Ellis, J., Carroll, J. C., Glogowski, E., Schrader, K., Bombard, Y., & Incidental Genomics Study Team (2020). Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28(9), 1178–1186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0640
Abstract
There is growing impetus to include measures of personal utility, the nonmedical value of information, in addition to clinical utility in health technology assessment (HTA) of genomic tests such as genomic sequencing (GS). However, personal utility and clinical utility are challenging to define and measure. This study aimed to explore what drives patients’ preferences for hypothetically learning medically actionable and non-medically actionable secondary findings (SF), capturing clinical and personal utility; this may inform development of measures to evaluate patient outcomes following return of SF. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults with a personal or family cancer history participating in a trial of a decision aid for selection of SF from genomic sequencing (GS) www.genomicsadviser.com
Interviews were analyzed thematically using constant comparison. Preserving health-related and non-health-related quality of life was an overarching motivator for both learning and not learning SF. Some participants perceived that learning SF would help them “have a good quality of life” through informing actions to maintain physical health or leading to psychological benefits such as emotional preparation for disease. Other participants preferred not to learn SF because results “could ruin your quality of life,” such as by causing negative psychological impacts. Measuring health-related and non-health-related quality of life may capture outcomes related to clinical and personal utility of GS and SF, which have previously been challenging to measure. Without appropriate measures, generating and synthesizing evidence to evaluate genomic technology such as GS will continue to be a challenge, and will undervalue potential benefits of GS and SF.
Hébert, J., Bergeron, A. S., Veillette, A. M., Bouchard, K., Nabi, H., & Dorval, M. (2022). Issues associated with a hereditary risk of cancer: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses in oncology settings. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 32(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.5737/23688076322272285
Abstract
Documenting a patient’s family history of cancer is useful in assessing their predisposition to some types of hereditary cancers. A group of nurses working with cancer patients were surveyed, by way of a questionnaire, to determine their level of knowledge about oncogenetics, describe various issues related to their capacity to identify, refer and support individuals with a hereditary risk of cancer, and explore their interest in continuing education on this topic. The findings show limited knowledge and a low sense of competence among the participating nurses, as well as a lack of access to university and continuing education programs in this field. Training focused on competency development would enhance their capacity to carry out an initial assessment of individuals who are potentially at risk for cancer and refer them to specialized resources.
Manuel, A., & Brunger, F. (2014). Making the decision to participate in predictive genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(6), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9733-4
Abstract
This paper describes the experience of predictive genetic testing for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy in the context of novel gene discovery. Two approaches to making the decision to engage in genetic testing were apparent: the decision to be tested either (a) develops gradually over time or (b) happens so quickly that it is felt as a “fait accompli.” Six key factors that influenced the particular approach taken by the participants were identified: (1) scientific process—available and relevant predictive genetic test; (2) numerous losses or deaths within the family; (3) physical signs and symptoms of disease; (4) gender; (5) sense of relational responsibility or moral obligation to other family members; and (6) family support. This study found that at risk individuals juxtapose scientific knowledge against their experiential knowledge and the six identified factors in order to make the decision to participate in genetic testing. Recommendations include the creation of a relational space within which to provide psychological counselling and assessment for the six identified factors that shape the decision to engage in predictive genetic testing.
Manuel, A., & Brunger, F. (2015). Awakening to a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study. Journal of Community Genetics, 6(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-015-0212-x
Abstract
Efforts of social scientists to understand how individuals living in a family at risk for a genetically linked condition make health care decisions, having brought to the forefront the contextual nature of risk perception. Using a grounded theory approach, this study examines the experiences of 29 individuals living in families at risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Attention is paid to how individuals (re)construct the meaning of being at risk in relation to the developing science of gene discovery. Findings highlight that individuals living in a family at risk for ARVC juxtapose existing scientific knowledge against experiential knowledge as they “awaken to” the fact that they or a family member are at risk. This process is pragmatic and fluid and contingent upon whether and how symptoms are aligned with the constructed image of the at-risk relative.
Manuel, A., & Brunger, F. (2016). Embodying a new meaning of being at risk. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393616674810
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia (ARVC/D) is a genetic condition that can cause fatal arrhythmias. The implantable cardioverter defibrillation (ICD) is a primary treatment for ARVC/D. Using a grounded theory approach, this study examines the experiences of 15 individuals living with an ICD. The ability to cope with and adjust to having an ICD is influenced by the acceptance of the ICD as something needed to survive, an understanding of the ICD’s function, existing support networks, and ones’ ability to manage everyday challenges. Coping well requires reshaping ideas about the meaning of being at risk and understanding how the ICD fits into that changing personal risk narrative. A thorough understanding of the unique needs of individuals with ARVC/D and of the specific factors contributing to the psychosocial distress related to having an ICD (vs. having the disease itself) is needed. Nurses must be prepared to provide ongoing support and education to this population.
Swadas, N., Dewell, S., & Davidson, S. (2022). Knowledge and attitudes of pharmacogenetics among Canadian nurses: Implications for nursing education. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education, 8(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1319
Abstract
Pharmacogenetic testing is used to tailor medication recommendations based on an individual's genetic makeup. Increased precision in prescribing medication through the use of genetics leads to a reduction in adverse drug reactions resulting in decreased morbidity and mortality. Due to the noted benefits to patient health outcomes and reduction in healthcare costs, a growing number of Canadian health centers and community pharmacies are beginning to offer pharmacogenetic testing. Previous studies indicate that Canadian nurses have minimal education in genomics; however, there has been an increase in attention to nursing roles in the implementation of genomic health practices in recent years. As the use of pharmacogenetics increases, nurses will be expected to be knowledgeable about pharmacogenetic testing and will play a key role in patient education. Results of previous studies show a low level of knowledge about pharmacogenetic testing among physicians and pharmacists; however, this area of knowledge has not been systematically assessed for nurses. To address this gap, a cross-sectional study was conducted to assess knowledge and attitudes about pharmacogenetics of nurses across Canada. An anonymous online survey was completed by 236 participants, including nursing students (n = 84), registered nurses (n = 144), and nurse practitioners/nurse clinicians (n = 9). Participants represented 9/10 provinces and 2/3 territories across Canada. The majority of the participants (65.9%) lacked formal education in genetics and indicated a fair or poor level of understanding of pharmacogenetic testing in the clinical setting (93%). The mean score for pharmacogenetic knowledge questions was 34.5%, while the mean score for genetics knowledge questions was 61.1%. Despite their self-reported lack of knowledge and understanding, most participants had positive attitudes towards pharmacogenetic testing and recognized its ability to decrease adverse drug reactions and improve clinical efficacy (81.3%). Most participants (73.7%) were interested in educational offerings related to pharmacogenetic testing, particularly web-based courses and seminars/lectures. The results of this study indicate that nurses across Canada may not have the necessary knowledge to support the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice. However, positive attitudes and interest in learning about pharmacogenetics indicate opportunities for the development of educational activities to ensure that Canadian nurses are prepared for upcoming changes that will impact nursing practice.